Signal Push & Signal Rush
5 stars based on
Yes Mike Freeman is excellent. Probably the best in the entire industry bar none. Highest level of ethical conduct and professionalism in all his offerings. I am glad the entire staff of this forum now agrees too.
Which has better technology, signal rush or signal push? Because that is what will determine where traders will go I believe. Apart from tenure, is there a difference in your replication technology when compared 2 signal rush? From the standpoint of a signal provider, which I plan to be, why should i go with one or the other? We will be very competitive as far as the tech goes we also will have APIs but I am not going to go into that like Ryan said its not out yet lol. Some of the advantages will be far and above Signal Push but I am not going to give them away ahead of time lets let Ryan worry about that later I fully support Signal Push of course if you become a provider with them they will lock you into a legally binding relationship for an extended period of time that if you were to say find another platform that payed you more or had some other unknown advantages you might be legally unable to work with them, owch Greetings all, Thought I would chime in real fast, here is a quick video and at around 44 seconds you can see the execution speed of the trade came in at about 0.
There is another example a little further along in the video also. Its Friday so for now I will leave you with the video as I want to get My weekend started, its going to be over degrees here in Dallas so time to head out to the lake for a nice bit of Jet Skiing. But I will say I do not want to get into a Pissing match With Signal Push, they have an outstanding product and have set the bar on performance. But I do think competition leads to innovation and better yet a choice of services, which can only be good for the end user.
If you have been following us on Facebook you can see our number one concern has been the quality of the product, which is why I have had to eat my own words several times on a release date as it got pushed back. If we did not think our product was ready even though it would be a nasty way of doing things, we could just not endorse any other products over here at bo.
I hope you enjoy the video feel free to come join our facebook page www. The site im happy to say is finally up and running for MT42Binary which is our demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 step into the market, we will be taking the same time and care getting Signal Rush up and Running also. We do that for a variety of reasons, to protect ourselves as we give access to patent pending technologythe clients and the providers.
From my perspective I want the widest distribution possible and not be tied to one provider. Borrowing from your Demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 example, as an app developer there is no lock-in in place at all. Maybe I've missed something You are an established platform Ryan so I don't know how we could work together but partnerships in my opinion that benefit both the companies and clients well why not.
There are so many opportunities for how to use auto-trading tech that nobody has scratched on yet so the market is wide open imo. If you have a certain proposed vision Ryan feel free to email the site owner on your ideas of this. Also their tech is very good and they do demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 their clients in a very fair and professional manner.
In any case, this thread for Demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 isn't the place to really discuss our legal, or even SignalPush or Signal Rush.
I'd suggest emailing us or starting a new thread for the proper discussion topic. I've emailed the bo. If they are not using your technology nor providing signals on your platform to threaten them is straight up dirty pool.
Also you have gone after people that don't use anything near your technology I have noted and were not active providing signals for your service at the time because they simply were looking to provide a competing signal service vs you. Here is the list of 3 main components I do not care for that you induce with your service.
Hence why you require signal providers to fill out tax forms of course I don't know how you do that with overseas clients but again they are partners not your employees so I don't like that.
Are you demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 to offer them k plans and health insurance? Heck that might even be a good marketing ploy lol. Simply point you state two different things in one statement A you make the statement repeating what I said "We've gone after people who were creating competing technology or were assisting others in creating a competing technology.
Then again its done often in the tech field but its the same crap different players and game. Very subtle but complete BS I can demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 the direct examples if you like but I don't think you would like that.
Wow you did it again you just can't resist lol. Really would hold up in court you think? Yes it is a place to discuss this as that is what a forum is for duh, education not just marketing lol.
Sorry if you don't like it but demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 does not make it any less true. On the s I would generally agree with you but you also impart W2s is that correct? Then again does not matter you are in the Demonstration top options binary signals service 2015. Well what point do we have the right to control their actions? You might stifle good technology from the market place with such prohibitive actions.
Example case in point look at " Options Domination " they directly took the concept JAS uses for their own signals page in the spreadsheetesk ding ding bell reporting and delivery of trades.
Should JAS sue them for using his delivery concept? I agree you should not steal the demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 work of others. Thankfully I have never used your technology or ever been a provider for you and generally never would, more for philosophical reasons then anything. Fri Apr 6 Tokyo: This discussion was created from comments split from: July edited July When its up and running you can see what my stats are then as I will have to go through the same beta testing as everybody else.
I don't own "Signal Rush" and I support any service that is a benefit to fellow bin traders. BRRRR it is getting cold in my neck of the woods now in the middle of summer. I was wondering what was going on until I saw Lotz giving props to Michael Freeman and then I recognized hell must be freezing over so demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 wonder it is cold in our dimension LOL.
Seriously I watched some of MF recent webinars and thought they were pretty good. The speakers were trying to help and most people seemed to be following. Some guys missed trades or got in late or wanted to get in again after winning but that happens demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 trading rooms. LOB makes mistakes at times and it is a sign of maturity to retract demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 if needed.
Also I much demonstration top options binary signals service 2015 LOB making better use of his time sharing his thought process. Education is what can really help bins not signals. No real-time in the markets so every ones results can not match infinitely. That is not rocket science it is as simple as that. Pavey baby I think you like him just a little bit too much haha.
Some who have used his autotrader might tend to not agree with you but lets give him credit where its due in moving in the right direction with his facebook group. I agree education and focusing on positive useful content will have a more positive effect.
So I will promote the good instead. Here is an example trade I did when I was reading your comment lol. I fully support Signal Push of course if you become a provider with them they will lock you into a legally binding relationship for an extended period of time that if you were to say find another platform that paid you more or had some other unknown advantages you might be legally unable to work with them, owch Thanks for splitting it.
For sure I don't know the full story and with people like you I would never get it. Simply put you state two different things in one statement A you make the statement repeating what I said "We've gone after people who were creating competing technology or were assisting others in creating a competing technology.
Waste of time even talking to you. Who do you think you are? Actually you gave me a really good idea that has nothing to do with this conversation ironically Sign In or Register to comment. Who's Online 1 1 Guest.